Page 34 - CII ARTHA_Next Generation_Web
P. 34

Global Trends



        Some of the other states which have have shown stronger   41.1 per cent in capex respectively in April-February FY24
        growth (CAGR) in capital spending in the post-pandemic   have witnessed a decline in growth by -4.9 per cent and -14.4   Global Economic
        period (FY22-25) compared to pre-pandemic levels (FY15-19),   per cent this year. Meanwhile, Karnataka, Maharashtra and
        are Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh.   Gujarat continue to push ahead with robust capex spending.

                                                                Among the 17 states, Punjab has surprisingly reported the      Outlook:
           THE CUMULATIVE CAPITAL EXPENDITURE OF                highest increase in capex (45.3 per cent) during FY25
           STATES HAS SHOWN MODERATION THIS                     (Apr-February) albeit on a low base; This is followed by
           YEAR COMPARED TO THE PREVIOUS YEAR                   Rajasthan (18 per cent) and Karnataka (15.6 per cent) which
                                                                rank second and third respectively. Haryana has recorded the   Navigating
                                                                highest drop in capex, at -36.6 per cent in April-February FY25
        Latest data show that cumulative spending of states fell from   followed by West Bengal (-22.8 per cent) and Jharkhand (-17.3
        Rs 5.11 lakh crore in April-February FY24 to Rs 4.86 lakh   per cent).
        crore in April-February FY25. And despite the overall drop in                                                          Geopolitical
        capex, only 8 of the seventeen states namely Gujarat,
        Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Uttar      UTTAR PRADESH HAS TOPPED THE CHARTS
        Pradesh, Telangana and Tamil Nadu have accounted for almost   IN TERMS OF QUANTUM OF CAPEX IN
        75 per cent of the total capital spend. Hence there is some   APR-FEB FY25                                             Tensions and
        concentration in terms of capex among states.
        And even within these eight states, which account for a high   What is noteworthy is that Uttar Pradesh has topped the   Trade Frictions
        quantum of capital spending, there has been a degrowth in
        capex spending in FY25. For instance, Tamil Nadu have   charts in the quantum of capex expenditure by investing Rs
                                                                78,842 crore in April-Feb FY25 even though it is less than the
        recorded a degrowth in its capex by 4.9 per cent during
        April-Feb FY25 as against 2.4 per cent growth in the similar   previous year's spending. This indicates a continued
        last year period. Similarly, Telangana and Uttar Pradesh, which   commitment to infrastructure development and economic
                                                                growth within the state. The focus is on infrastructure
        experienced a massive capex spending of 147.9 per cent and
                                                                development including enhancing freight movement and
                                                                boosting connectivity. This is followed by Madhya Pradesh       Introduction                                           and uncertainties have climbed to new high. Intensifying downside risks
                                                                which invested Rs 50,795 crore and Maharashtra with Rs                                                                 dominate the outlook, amid escalating trade tensions and financial
                                                                49,216 crore during the year with higher allocation towards                                                            market adjustments.” Consequently, growth could suffer in both
                                                                                                                               G   this year due to factors like geopolitical tensions, increased
                                                                urban development, irrigation, and transport, among others.        lobal anxiety surrounds the outlook for economic growth   the medium and near term.
                                                                In view of the concern about the decline in state capex during   trade frictions, and market volatility. These uncertainties,   Unsurprisingly, global growth forecasts have been revised
                                                                the year, the government has released nearly Rs 1.5 lakh crore   particularly regarding US tariffs and unpredictable trade policies   markedly down compared with the January 2025 World
                                                                in interest-free capex loans to states for FY25, surpassing the   could significantly impact global economic prospects. The   Economic Outlook (WEO) Update, reflecting effective tariff rates
                                                                revised estimate, with half linked to reforms and project-based   likelihood of a trade war, with the potential for a global   at levels not seen in a century and a highly unpredictable global
                                                                funding. Besides, states facing natural disasters were provided   economic slowdown, is a major concern. As the International   environment. Global growth has been scaled downwards by 50
                                                                with an additional allocation of up to 50 per cent of the      Monetary Fund (IMF), pointed out in its latest World Economic   basis points from the January 2025 forecasts to 2.8 per cent in
                                                                amount already allocated under the untied category. The        Outlook (WEO) Update (April 2025): “Global landscape has   2025. A mild pick up to 3.0 per cent is being pencilled in for 2026.
                                                                government should continue with the 50-year interest free      changed as governments around the world reorder policy priorities
                                                                loans scheme for state capex.
                                                                It is suggested that provisions may also be made for enhancing
                                                                the untied component of capital expenditure loans to states as                              Global growth trajectory (at constant prices, y-o-y%)
                                                                it allows them to allocate funds more flexibly to their specific
                                                                needs such as natural disasters and other developmental                  8.0
                                                                priorities. This contrasts with the tied component, which is                                        6.6
                                                                earmarked for specific projects or reforms.                              6.0
                                                                                                                                                   3.7                       3.6
 An analysis of individual states in the post pandemic period,                                                                           4.0                                          3.3     3.2       3.3     3.3      3.1
 over the last four years, throws up a few surprises. For       A major concern is to address the challenge of capacity
 example, Jharkhand experienced the highest cumulative          constraints faced by some states to undertake capital                    2.0
 compound annual growth rate (CAGR) in capital expenditure      expenditure to the extent that is required for taking the state          0.0               -2.7
 among all states, reaching 36 per cent between FY22 and FY25.  forward. The Centre could consider handholding such states or
                                                                providing incentives so that the laggard states also join the            -2.0
                                                                national mainstream when it comes to capital spending.
 This growth surpasses the 27 per cent CAGR observed in the                                                                                       Average  2020     2021     2022    2023     2024    2025 (F)  2026 (F)  2029 (F)
 state between FY15 and FY19, before the pandemic. No doubt,                                                                             -4.0    2000-2019
 this has come over a low base, but a whopping rise in capex    To conclude, states should be encouraged to align their funding
 between FY22-24, which somewhat moderated in FY25, shows       with capital expenditure to stimulate economic growth,                   Note: F is Forecast
 that Jharkhand has invested significantly in asset creation in the   infrastructure development and job creation to drive               Source: World Economic Outlook, IMF (April 2025)
 post pandemic period.                                          economic expansion in the country


        34   QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS                                                                                                                                                                       QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS  35
             APRIL 2025
                                                                                                                                                                                                                               APRIL 2025
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39